User uShare Login | Register
Login
Register

Along with posting photos, videos, and stories, your uShare account lets you post Classified Ads, recipes on What's For Dinner, and Announcements.


-6° View Weather Current Conditions Sioux Falls Change Location
Set Weather Options

RADAR LOCATION

TEMPERATURE LOCATION

Report conditions in your area, send photos to ushare@keloland.com

KELOLAND.com | Sioux Falls News & Weather, South Dakota News & Weather, Minnesota and Iowa News

[0] My Saved Articles
Find local businesses
on the KELO Pages!

 

SD Supreme Court: Brad Reay Asks For New Trial

October 1, 2008, 5:08 PM by Ben Dunsmoor

SD Supreme Court: Brad Reay Asks For New Trial
The Pierre man convicted of murdering his wife and dumping her naked body near the Oahe dam wants a new trial. Brad Reay's attorney told the South Dakota Supreme Court Wednesday his trial was missing one person's testimony on how evidence was handled. 

Investigators sealed off the Reay family home in Pierre in February 2006. But Brad Reay's attorney is raising questions about how state investigators handled evidence between the crime scene and the court room. 

Brad Reay's attorney Tim Rensch says, "It's their requirement to properly trace the chain of the evidence showing the exact whereabouts and rendering it improbable that the evidence ever would have been changed, modified, substituted, excetera." 

Brad Reay's attorney, Tim Rensch, says the trial was missing the state crime lab custodian's testimony. It's something Supreme Court Justice John Konenkamp says is a common part of a murder trial. 

South Dakota Supreme Court Justice John Konenkamp says, "I've been a judge for 24 years and I've never seen a case where a prosecutor doesn't put in a complete chain and this is really extraordinary." 

The attorney for the state argued while the custodian didn't testify, several other investigators did explain how they handled evidence, which should be good enough. 

State attorney Steven Blair says, "The state does not have to put on a perfect or complete chain of custody. We just have to put on a sufficient chain of custody that shows the whereabouts of that evidence from the time it's collected, or in this case from the time it entered the lab, until it's introduced at trial. And it makes it improbable that it was altered or substituted." 

Now it's up to the South Dakota Supreme Court Justices to decide whether the missing testimony is enough to warrant a new trial. 

Reay's attorney also argued Reay's mother-in-law was allowed to testify, and the judge wouldn't allow the jury to consider the defense's theory about what happened. 

The Supreme Court's decision will come at a later date.


Previous Story

Next Story


Sponsored
Find Local Businesses on KELO Pages!

You may also like

Semis Crash When Both Don't Fit Under Overpass

2/23/2015 12:32 PM

A semi driver had to be taken to the hospital following a crash on Interstate 90.

Full Story
Two New Members Join The KELOLAND Family

2/23/2015 4:41 PM

The KELOLAND family grew by two over the weekend.

Full Story
3 Teens In Custody After Driving Stolen Vehicle

2/24/2015 11:04 AM

Early Tuesday morning, a Sioux Falls woman reported her 2001 Land Rover Discovery was stolen. A set of keys were left in the vehicle's center cons...

Full Story
1 Dead, Others Injured In 3-Car Crash Near Pierre

2/21/2015 10:17 AM

The three vehicles collided east of the capital city on Highways 14 and 83.

Full Story
Huron Woman Dies In 3-Car Crash Near Pierre

2/21/2015 5:02 PM

A three-vehicle crash left one woman dead and five people hurt Friday.

Full Story


Events