User uShare Login | Register

Along with posting photos, videos, and stories, your uShare account lets you post Classified Ads, recipes on What's For Dinner, and Announcements.

22° View Weather Current Conditions Sioux Falls Change Location
Set Weather Options



 Winter Weather for November 26, 2015

SkyCam Network

Severe Weather

State Radar

Available on iOS and Android

Send photos to

Storm Center Update



[0] My Saved Articles
Find local businesses
on the KELO Pages!


Should A Urine Test Lead To Drug Charges?

March 24, 2014, 4:53 PM by Ben Dunsmoor

Should A Urine Test Lead To Drug Charges?

The South Dakota Supreme Court is considering whether remnants of cocaine found in a urine sample are enough to convict a Spearfish man of drug possession.

An attorney for 25-year-old Sean Whistler says his client shouldn't have been found guilty because authorities never actually found cocaine during his 2012 DUI arrest.

"Your honors, there was no cocaine anywhere. There was no cocaine present in the truck. There was no cocaine on Mr. Whistler's person," Matthew Pike with the Lawrence County Public Defender’s Office said.

Spearfish Police pulled over Whistler in March of 2012. He had a blood alcohol level nearly three times the legal limit and marijuana was found inside his vehicle.

A urine test later found Whistler also had something called benzoylecgonine in his system, which is a metabolite of cocaine. As a result, Whistler was also charged and convicted of possessing cocaine. Pike argues the same substance can be found in tap water and over-the-counter medications and his client should have never been found guilty.

"When people are now convicted in our state for possession of a controlled substance specifying cocaine when there is no cocaine anywhere that seems to be an absurd result," Pike said.

"Possession occurs if a person knowingly possesses an altered state of a drug or substance absorbed into the human body," Assistant South Dakota Attorney General John Strohman argued.

Strohman told the justices that state law allows for drug possession charges for any controlled substance properties found inside a suspect's system. Strohman insists Whistler has no argument.

"Our state legislature has passed a statute saying to the contrary; appellants problem is with the legislature," Strohman said.

Whistler's attorney also argued that there is no way to prove how the substance got into his client's system, something the state's own witness admitted during the trial.

It will take several weeks for the justices to make their final ruling in the case.

Read the legal briefs in the case by clicking here. 

Previous Story

Next Story




View news

You may also like

Roslyn Man Arrested In Shooting

11/21/2015 4:46 PM

A Roslyn, South Dakota man is accused of trying to kill another man overnight.

Full Story
Ronald Neels Sentenced To 75 Years In Prison

11/23/2015 5:59 PM

For more than a decade, nobody knew Ronald Neels was sexually abusing a victim inside his home near Garretson. The victim never said anything about th...

Full Story | Watch
Joseph Patterson Sentenced To Life In Prison

11/19/2015 3:55 PM

A judge has sentenced a man who was found guilty in the death of a two-year-old to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Full Story
Jared Fogle Gets More Than 15 Years In Prison

11/19/2015 12:20 PM

A judge has sentenced former Subway pitchman Jared Fogle to 15 years and eight months in prison for trading in child pornography and having sex with u...

Full Story
Tyrese Ruffin's Mother Speaks Publicly For First Time

11/25/2015 6:18 AM

In her first and only television interview, Doohen talked about her son, who she called the joy of her life.

Full Story