User uShare Login | Register
Login
Register

Along with posting photos, videos, and stories, your uShare account lets you post Classified Ads, recipes on What's For Dinner, and Announcements.


71° View Weather Current Conditions Sioux Falls Change Location
Set Weather Options

RADAR LOCATION

TEMPERATURE LOCATION

News

[0] My Saved Articles
Find local businesses
on the KELO Pages!

 

Should A Urine Test Lead To Drug Charges?

March 24, 2014, 4:53 PM by Ben Dunsmoor

Should A Urine Test Lead To Drug Charges?
VERMILLION, SD -

The South Dakota Supreme Court is considering whether remnants of cocaine found in a urine sample are enough to convict a Spearfish man of drug possession.

An attorney for 25-year-old Sean Whistler says his client shouldn't have been found guilty because authorities never actually found cocaine during his 2012 DUI arrest.

"Your honors, there was no cocaine anywhere. There was no cocaine present in the truck. There was no cocaine on Mr. Whistler's person," Matthew Pike with the Lawrence County Public Defender’s Office said.

Spearfish Police pulled over Whistler in March of 2012. He had a blood alcohol level nearly three times the legal limit and marijuana was found inside his vehicle.

A urine test later found Whistler also had something called benzoylecgonine in his system, which is a metabolite of cocaine. As a result, Whistler was also charged and convicted of possessing cocaine. Pike argues the same substance can be found in tap water and over-the-counter medications and his client should have never been found guilty.

"When people are now convicted in our state for possession of a controlled substance specifying cocaine when there is no cocaine anywhere that seems to be an absurd result," Pike said.

"Possession occurs if a person knowingly possesses an altered state of a drug or substance absorbed into the human body," Assistant South Dakota Attorney General John Strohman argued.

Strohman told the justices that state law allows for drug possession charges for any controlled substance properties found inside a suspect's system. Strohman insists Whistler has no argument.

"Our state legislature has passed a statute saying to the contrary; appellants problem is with the legislature," Strohman said.

Whistler's attorney also argued that there is no way to prove how the substance got into his client's system, something the state's own witness admitted during the trial.

It will take several weeks for the justices to make their final ruling in the case.

Read the legal briefs in the case by clicking here. 

Previous Story

Next Story


Comments







 
Find Local Businesses on KELO Pages!

View news

You may also like

Sutton Bay CEO Dies In UTV Rollover Crash

8/25/2014 2:34 PM

The CEO of Sutton Bay Resort in central South Dakota died after rolling his 2014 Polaris Ranger late Sunday night.

Full Story
Authorities Search For Missing Inmate

8/24/2014 10:43 AM

31-year-old Bridget Franzen failed to report to a work release job on Saturday, August 23.

Full Story
SF Mother, Daughter Admit To Large Drug Conspiracy

8/27/2014 10:54 AM

Faith Rasmussen, 21, and her 55-year-old mother Theresa Rasmussen admit they were bringing marijuana from California to South Dakota and distributing ...

Full Story
Car vs. School Bus Crash Near Inwood, Iowa

8/26/2014 11:31 AM

Authorities in northwest Iowa are investigating a serious crash involving a car and a school bus.

Full Story
SF Drug Ring Involved 220 lbs. Of Marijuana

8/27/2014 5:48 PM

Her boyfriend was killed during a botched robbery in December in northwest Sioux Falls. Faith Rasmussen and her mother, Theresa, have now pleaded guil...

Full Story | Watch


Events