South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley says his office is reviewing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling to determine if it will have any effect on the state's law regarding blood tests for people suspected of drunken driving.
The Supreme Court has ruled that police usually must try to get a search warrant from a judge before ordering blood tests for drunken-driving suspects. The justices say the natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood is generally not sufficient reason to get rid of the requirement that police get a judge's approval before drawing a blood sample.
Jackley says the Supreme Court decision does not address South Dakota's requirement that anyone driving a vehicle is considered to have given consent to the withdrawal and analysis of the person's blood or breath.
Most Popular Today
- 1.Retail & Restaurants
What Will Cost More/Less In 2015
- 2.Your Money Matters
Denny Sanford To Donate $25 Million For Scholarship Program
- 3.Your Money Matters
Denny Sanford's Multi-Million Solution To Worker Shortage
Sony Cancels 'The Interview' Dec. 25 Release
Top Theater Chains Cancel 'The Interview' Showings
Sturgis Officials Planning For 2015 Rally Traffic
- 7.Meetings & Events, High School
HS Basketball To Fill Pentagon
- 8.Gas & Energy
Sioux Falls Average Gas Price Among The Lowest In U.S.
- 9.Gas & Energy
SD Gas Prices At Five-Year Low
SDSU Research Park First Certified Technology Park