South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley says his office is reviewing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling to determine if it will have any effect on the state's law regarding blood tests for people suspected of drunken driving.
The Supreme Court has ruled that police usually must try to get a search warrant from a judge before ordering blood tests for drunken-driving suspects. The justices say the natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood is generally not sufficient reason to get rid of the requirement that police get a judge's approval before drawing a blood sample.
Jackley says the Supreme Court decision does not address South Dakota's requirement that anyone driving a vehicle is considered to have given consent to the withdrawal and analysis of the person's blood or breath.
Most Popular Today
Costco Citigroup Partnership To Have Impact On Citibank In Sioux Falls
Great Western Bank To Close Two Sioux Falls Branches
Target Plans $2B In Cost-Cutting Moves
Lloyd Scraps Plans For Former School For The Deaf
- 5.Your Money Matters
Big Plans For Main Avenue
- 6.Crops, Agriculture, General
Wheat Growers/North Central Leaders Explain Merger
- 7.Your Money Matters
Orion Franchise Opening In Dubai
3 Possible Downtown Locations For Mixed-Use Developments
- 9.Gas & Energy
South Dakota PUC Approves Rate Hikes For Black Hills Power
Wednesday Morning Business Brief