South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley says his office is reviewing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling to determine if it will have any effect on the state's law regarding blood tests for people suspected of drunken driving.
The Supreme Court has ruled that police usually must try to get a search warrant from a judge before ordering blood tests for drunken-driving suspects. The justices say the natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood is generally not sufficient reason to get rid of the requirement that police get a judge's approval before drawing a blood sample.
Jackley says the Supreme Court decision does not address South Dakota's requirement that anyone driving a vehicle is considered to have given consent to the withdrawal and analysis of the person's blood or breath.
Most Popular Today
- 1.Your Money Matters
Downtown Sioux Falls Store Featured By Google
General Motors, Subaru Models Added To Takata Air Bag Recall
- 3.Gas & Energy
BNSF, Power Plant Owner Settle Long-Running Rate Dispute
- 4.Education Funding
Rutland School District Residents To Vote Again On Opt Out
City/State Development Partnership To Be Announced
- 6.Your Money Matters
Business Succeeding Online
- 7.Gas & Energy
Federal Commission Asked To Review Proposed Uranium Mine
Thursday Afternoon Business Brief
Friday Morning Business Brief
- 10.Your Money Matters
National Book Features Sioux Falls' Businesses