User uShare Login | Register
Login
Register

Along with posting photos, videos, and stories, your uShare account lets you post Classified Ads, recipes on What's For Dinner, and Announcements.


63° View Weather Current Conditions Sioux Falls Change Location
Set Weather Options

RADAR LOCATION

TEMPERATURE LOCATION

Share your Photos, Videos, and Stories on uShare! Click here to get started.

News

[0] My Saved Articles
Find local businesses
on the KELO Pages!

 

SD High Court: Warrant Needed For DUI Blood Samples

August 21, 2014, 4:35 PM by Ben Dunsmoor

SD High Court: Warrant Needed For DUI Blood Samples
PIERRE, SD -

The five South Dakota Supreme Court justices all agree; officers in the state can't take a blood sample from a suspected drunk driver without a warrant or the suspect's consent.

They handed down the unanimous decision Thursday after Shauna Fierro's case went in front of the high court earlier this year.

The Butte County woman refused to give a blood sample during a DUI arrest last August.

"This was a mandatory blood draw scenario where the government is piercing the skin of a fellow citizen to collect evidence and that's a pretty serious invasion of privacy," Fierro's attorney Joe Kosel said Thursday.

Previous Story: SD Supreme Court Hears DUI Blood Draw Case 

Fierro's attorneys argued in front of the Supreme Court in May that under the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last year in Missouri v. McNeely law enforcement must get a warrant or consent to take a sample.

"What the state can't do is say we've passed a law that now has essentially as a legal fiction abrogated the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement," Fierro's appeal attorney Ron Parsons said on May 28.

Justice Lori Wilbur agreed in Thursday’s decision that state law can't trump the Constitution.

"Our precedent is clear that the Legislature cannot enact a statute that would preempt a citizen's constitutional right, such as a citizen's Fourth Amendment right," Wilbur wrote.

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley says the ruling means law enforcement and the legislature will both have to make changes in DUI protocol.

"Really all 50 states are dealing with some level of adjusting their DUI laws to both take into account balancing the interest of protecting the public from drunk drivers and that level of government intrusion," Jackley said.

Several law enforcement agencies across South Dakota were already getting warrants for DUI blood draws following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in April of 2013. This decision on the state level reinforces the law and will bring more uniformity in arrests.

Previous Story

Next Story


Comments







 
Find Local Businesses on KELO Pages!

View news

You may also like

Jesus Take The Wheel

9/25/2014 10:00 PM

Miracle on the highway: that's how many people are describing a bad crash between a semi-truck and car in which no one was killed.

Full Story | Watch
Iowa Teen Dies Two Days After Fight At School

9/28/2014 11:42 AM

Prosecutors may file additional charges because a western Iowa teen died two days after suffering a head injury during a fight at school.

Full Story
Police: Missing Boy Shows Up At School

9/26/2014 6:39 AM

Sioux Falls police say a missing boy showed up for school Friday morning.  

Full Story
Man Charged With Rape And Recording Women In USD Showers

9/24/2014 12:07 PM

According to court papers, police first had contact with Daniel R. Hammer on August 28.

Full Story
Emergency Crews Respond To Crash On Interstate 229

9/30/2014 11:45 AM

One woman is seriously hurt after a five-vehicle crash on Interstate 229 Tuesday morning.

Full Story


Events