User uShare Login | Register
Login
Register

Along with posting photos, videos, and stories, your uShare account lets you post Classified Ads, recipes on What's For Dinner, and Announcements.


73° View Weather Current Conditions Sioux Falls Change Location
Set Weather Options

RADAR LOCATION

TEMPERATURE LOCATION

Mitchell @ Yankton at 7 p.m.
 
 
 

News

[0] My Saved Articles
Find local businesses
on the KELO Pages!

 

SD High Court: Warrant Needed For DUI Blood Samples

August 21, 2014, 4:35 PM by Ben Dunsmoor

SD High Court: Warrant Needed For DUI Blood Samples
PIERRE, SD -

The five South Dakota Supreme Court justices all agree; officers in the state can't take a blood sample from a suspected drunk driver without a warrant or the suspect's consent.

They handed down the unanimous decision Thursday after Shauna Fierro's case went in front of the high court earlier this year.

The Butte County woman refused to give a blood sample during a DUI arrest last August.

"This was a mandatory blood draw scenario where the government is piercing the skin of a fellow citizen to collect evidence and that's a pretty serious invasion of privacy," Fierro's attorney Joe Kosel said Thursday.

Previous Story: SD Supreme Court Hears DUI Blood Draw Case 

Fierro's attorneys argued in front of the Supreme Court in May that under the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last year in Missouri v. McNeely law enforcement must get a warrant or consent to take a sample.

"What the state can't do is say we've passed a law that now has essentially as a legal fiction abrogated the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement," Fierro's appeal attorney Ron Parsons said on May 28.

Justice Lori Wilbur agreed in Thursday’s decision that state law can't trump the Constitution.

"Our precedent is clear that the Legislature cannot enact a statute that would preempt a citizen's constitutional right, such as a citizen's Fourth Amendment right," Wilbur wrote.

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley says the ruling means law enforcement and the legislature will both have to make changes in DUI protocol.

"Really all 50 states are dealing with some level of adjusting their DUI laws to both take into account balancing the interest of protecting the public from drunk drivers and that level of government intrusion," Jackley said.

Several law enforcement agencies across South Dakota were already getting warrants for DUI blood draws following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in April of 2013. This decision on the state level reinforces the law and will bring more uniformity in arrests.

Previous Story

Next Story


Comments







Sponsored

 


View news

You may also like

Authorities Searching For Attempted Abduction Suspect

8/31/2015 5:34 AM

Deuel County Emergency Management said the girl was able to escape when a man attempted to take her.

Full Story
Incident In Yankton Under Investigation

9/2/2015 4:10 AM

The parking lot of Ferdig's Transmissions & Exhaust appears to be a focus of the investigation.  A mobile command post is set up at the s...

Full Story
Mitchell Man Killed In Officer-Involved Shooting

9/4/2015 9:40 AM

During a struggle, Officer Russ Stevenson shot and killed armed suspect 37-year-old Curtis James Meyer.

Full Story
Domestic Disturbance Led To Officer-Involved Shooting

9/2/2015 9:58 AM

The South Dakota Attorney General's office said Yankton Police Sgt. Jason Foote shot Trae Allen Angel in a downtown alley.

Full Story
2 Praying Mantises Found In Aberdeen

8/31/2015 6:57 AM

Alyssa Anderson, an assistant professor of biology at Northern State University, says mantises are not native to this area, and how they got to Aberde...

Full Story


Events