![]() Jul 18, 2009
SD connection to DC pay to play scandal.
Posted by: Pat Powers - 07/18/2009 10:26 AM (IM10) Remember South Dakota’s Initiated Measure 10? That measure put on the ballot and promoted by the now defunct organization, the South Dakota Conservative Action Council. One of the primary goals of the poorly worded measure was to get rid of “pay to play politics.” This measure was mainly funded by out-of-state organizations, most of which was funnelled in through the SDCAC, so it could be hidden from voter’s eyes. One of the few donations that the measure would fess up to (as opposed to hiding it through the SDCAC) was from the Americans for Tax Reform, as you can see below… …..where they kicked in $10,000 to end “pay to play.”
Read it here. Of course, no one believed that this was the only out of state donation, since the SDCAC with no visible means of support magically came up with hundreds of thousands of dollars towards the effort. Anyway, the Americans for Tax Reform brought in their national president - Grover Norquist - to come to SD to campaign in favor of the measure. In addition to the ATU, Norquist serves on the board of the American Conservative Union. Why is this whole “IM 10 pay-to-play” thing worth dragging back out of the muck and mire it had disappeared into? Well, because of a recent article that is coming from the Politico website on pay to play politics in Washington:
Read it here. If you read the article, and hit some of the side links, you can see the original letter which is alleged to offer the “pay to play” for $2 million, and the later letter which came out against FedEx when they refused to cough up. With the original letter coming out under American Conservative Union letterhead, and the second letter being written under the banners of the ACU & Americans for Tax Reform. Including Grover Norquist as a signatory to the second letter. So, it looks like groups and individuals involved in promoting the South Dakota measure against alleged “pay to play” were involved in shaking down organizations for their own version of “pay to play.” And we still don’t know the identity of the out-of-state groups who ponied up the hundreds of thousands of dollars for the SD Measure that were funneled through the SDCAC. If we ever will. But at the least, we have an ironic postscript for Initiated Measure 10’s footnote in history. Which is a very minor footnote, at that. Post a Comment
|



There are no comments at this time.