![]() May 4, 2009
Special housing and employment protections to drug dealers?
Posted by: Pat Powers - 05/04/2009 8:19 PM (2010 election) You have got to be kidding me. In what has come to be almost ritualistic every few years in South Dakota, the dope smokers have gotten up off the couch to try to foist another dope legalization measure on South Dakota.
And as in every measure that’s come before, it has several fatal flaws - not the least of which is a twist I hadn’t noticed in past measures. * It legalizes medical pot for kids. And then there’s the latest twist - Under this act, Dope Dealing would become a protected class of citizen when it comes to housing under South Dakota law:
So. As a landlord, if you personally and morally objected to illegal drugs and the people who sell them - guess what? Under this law, they would now have a cause of action to sue you if you didn’t want drugs on your property. Object to drug dealers working for your place of business? Again, they’d now have a cause of action to bring suit against you. It doesn’t matter if they use it for medical reasons - all they’d have to prove is that they have the “get out of jail free” card as almost every pot grower in the state would have access to just by asking, and you’d have no recourse. Your property could be used to grow drugs without your say so, and as an employer, you’d be forced to retain a drug dealer employee as long as they had their card because of the special protections they’ve created for themselves as a result of the act. Special rights for drug dealers? I think not. Somehow, I think this act is destined for the dust bin of history - just like every measure of it’s kind that has gone before. Post a Comment
|


There are no comments at this time.