KELOLAND.com Search   Advanced Search.RSS Story Links
Online Opinion Poll
Online Opinion is your chance to tell Keloland what you think.
Remember - our on-air polls are scientific. Online Opinion is not. It's simply an easy way to speak your mind.

As of today, 574 questions have been posted and 1,066,602 votes have been cast. Click Here to view the Online Opinion archives.


Nov 3, 2009
Post Game Analysis Election 09
Posted by: Ken Blanchard - 11/03/2009 11:20 PM (Election Governor, Obama)


Christie_mcdonnell

Blanchard's Wise Predictions (and retroactively wise non-prediction)

As expected, yours truly correctly predicted the outcome of tonight's gubernatorial elections. As I said, Robert McDonnell crushed Creigh Deeds in Virginia. In American elections anything over 10 percent is considered a landslide. With 99% counted, McDonnell won almost 59% of the vote to Deeds' 41%. That is considerably better than McDonnell polled. Only Survey USA got it right, predicting an 18% margin. The rest of the polls were under 15%.

Likewise, Republican William T "Bill" Bolling beat Democrat Jody Wagner for Lt. Governor 56/44%, and Ken Cuccinelli beat Stephen Shannon 58/42.

Somewhat braver (though not all that brave, as I hedged my bet) was my prediction of a narrow victory for Chris Christie over Jon Corzine. Christie won 49/45%.

I neglected to make a prediction in New York 23, which was a good thing for me. Results are still coming in at this hour, but it looks like the Democrat Bill Owens will take the House Seat by a narrow margin over Doug Hoffman. With 77% reporting, Owens leads 49/47%.

Analysis NY23

If Owens does win NY23, that will be a sign of God's grace towards Democrats. They will want to talk all about this one. Maybe exit polling will give us a clearer picture of what happened, but it will be undeniable that the Republicans self-destructed, handing the Democrats a seat they hadn't won in a hundred years. My Spin Witch says they will talk about extremists taking over the party, and the Republican Party splitting at the seams.

But the blame for the loss has to sit with the Republican leadership that nominated Scozzafava. Without a primary to test the voter's sentiments, the party leadership has to be competent to choose a palatable nominee. They didn't have to pick a strict conservative, but surely they could have picked someone who didn't look like (and turned out to be) a Democrat in Republican clothes. Now the Democrats get another House vote, but then, that's what they would have had with Scozzafava.

Analysis Virginia

This was a really significant victory for the GOP. Barack Obama beat John McCain 53/46% in Virginia. Democrats have held the state house in 12 years. This resurgence in Virginia clearly shows that the momentum and enthusiasm has shifted dramatically, from strongly unfavorable to Republicans to strongly favorable, in the months that Obama has been President. It also means that Republicans hold the offices from which future governors and senators can easily launch their campaigns.

Why did McDonnell and company win so big? McDonnell is as conservative as they come, but he focused on the economic issues motivating his base and, just as important, motivating independents. The latter seem to have broken for the Republicans in a big way.

Analysis New Jersey

This was the really big achievement for the GOP today. New Jersey is a solidly blue state (about 2/1 Democrat/Republican in registration). Barack Obama visited the state four times at least in recent weeks, and Joe Biden campaigned there as well. No, New Jersey wasn't a "referendum on the Obama Presidency." It was a referendum on the Corzine governorship and on the government of New Jersey in general. But it was a test of the old Obama magic, and his get up and go has got up and went.

Why did Christie win? The factor that made victory possible was the deep hole that Corzine dug himself in his previous term. What made a Republican victory actual was the tremendous surge in Republican enthusiasm. In some New Jersey counties, Republican turnout was three times greater than in the last gubernatorial election. Or so I think I heard Karl Rove say. Even in New Jersey that can make a difference.

On the other hand, Corzine wouldn't have had a chance without two big advantages. One was independent Chris Daggett. If Daggett had drawn support in the double digits, Corzine would probably have survived. Under 6% (according to the numbers crunchers) and Daggett ceased to be a factor. He drew 5.5%. The other factor was Corzine's deep pockets. He has personally purchased a Senate seat and state house. He spent, I kid you not, $30 million in his attempt to win reelection. Talk about a bad investment. I think he qualifies for a Federal bailout.

 

Comments
Lisa: If winning back Virginia and winning a solidly blue state house isn't a conservative gain, I don't know what one would look like. I do mention the enthusiasm gap without analyzing the reasons for it on either side. Republicans/Conservatives were fired up, to be sure, by what they see as the excesses of the Democrats. No doubt many Democrats/liberals/and progressives stayed home because they were insufficiently stimulated by Obama's first year in office. But how can those two facts possibly add up to anything other than a conservative gain?

Posted by: KB - Nov 04, 2009 1:58 PM
Ron: That's district 23 in New York. You could have checked up above where I do mention it, but then you aren't too good at noticing things. If you were, you might have noticed that Jon Corzine was calling New Jersey an important national election, and that President Obama visited it four times. You might also have noticed, as I mentioned, that Virginia was tending Democrat over the last decade. The fact that it switched back vigorously might be significant.

Posted by: KB - Nov 04, 2009 1:52 PM
Interesting that many Republicans(?)/Conservatives(?) hope to believe two victories, one in a state which until the '08 election, voted nationally Republican forty-four years in a row(Virginia)and one in New Jersey, a traditionally independent state, take these as the sign of some kind of mandate on Obama's policies. Bullhockey!! And that partisan bias leaves out the Democratic victory in district 123 won in upstate NY, a place which has voted Republican since the 1854 election!! I would say, all other things being equal, these results mean nothing definitive. Nada.

Posted by: Ron Link - Nov 04, 2009 1:02 AM
You, like most partisans, miss the factor regarding voter turnout and the disappointment in Obama. In his first nine months in office he did not make the changes we voted for him to make. There is discontent among us that the Republicans will not and cannot address. I suppose we have to descend to the tea party tactics to make ourselves understood. This election signals a wider division, not a a conservative gain.

Posted by: Lisa - Nov 03, 2009 11:59 PM
Post a Comment
Name

Email

Remember my information?
Yes No

Subscribe to this comment thread?
Yes No
Comments



Enter the word in the image for verification.

 

Web Site Design and Custom Programming By: Lawrence & Schiller© 2009 KELO-TV -- KELOLAND.COM -- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED